SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GOLDFARB, C 11-00938 WHA. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120518b14
Visitors: 27
Filed: May 17, 2012
Latest Update: May 17, 2012
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. Defendants' Motion For Continuance of the Hearing Date was submitted on this date, due to the unexpected unavailability of lead counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion for a short continuance of the hearing date. After full consideration of the matter, and for good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion For Con
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. Defendants' Motion For Continuance of the Hearing Date was submitted on this date, due to the unexpected unavailability of lead counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion for a short continuance of the hearing date. After full consideration of the matter, and for good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion For Cont..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING
[PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Defendants' Motion For Continuance of the Hearing Date was submitted on this date, due to the unexpected unavailability of lead counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion for a short continuance of the hearing date. After full consideration of the matter, and for good cause having been shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Defendants' Motion For Continuance of the Hearing Date is GRANTED. Then new hearing date for the Motion for Relief From Order Requiring Immediate Payment (Dkt. 30) shall be May 23, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
