ORACLE USA, INC. v. SAP AG, C 07-1658 PJH. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120521589
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. The court has reviewed some of the pretrial filings, and it is apparent that some will need to be revised, given the denial of Oracle's motions for clarification/reconsideration. Since no evidence relating to the hypothetical license measure of damages will be permitted at the upcoming trial, the exhibit lists and witness lists (at a minimum) must be revised. The revised papers should be filed prior to the pretrial conference, if possible, but in any
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. The court has reviewed some of the pretrial filings, and it is apparent that some will need to be revised, given the denial of Oracle's motions for clarification/reconsideration. Since no evidence relating to the hypothetical license measure of damages will be permitted at the upcoming trial, the exhibit lists and witness lists (at a minimum) must be revised. The revised papers should be filed prior to the pretrial conference, if possible, but in any e..
More
ORDER
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court has reviewed some of the pretrial filings, and it is apparent that some will need to be revised, given the denial of Oracle's motions for clarification/reconsideration. Since no evidence relating to the hypothetical license measure of damages will be permitted at the upcoming trial, the exhibit lists and witness lists (at a minimum) must be revised. The revised papers should be filed prior to the pretrial conference, if possible, but in any event no later than two weeks from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
