Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MERCURY INTERACTIVE, LLC, 5:07-cv-02822 WHA. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20120720d69 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2012
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION FOR FILING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on May 10, 2012, Defendants Amnon Landan, Douglas Smith, and Susan Skaer brought a Motion for Discovery Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 37 and the in
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION FOR FILING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 10, 2012, Defendants Amnon Landan, Douglas Smith, and Susan Skaer brought a Motion for Discovery Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 37 and the inherent authority of the Court (Dkt. 212);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SEC filed an Opposition on May 24, 2012 (Dkt. 217), and Defendants filed a Reply on May 31, 2012 (Dkt. 222);

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2012, the Court heard oral argument on Defendants' Motion;

WHEREAS, at the June 7, 2012 hearing the Court agreed to continue the hearing to (1) allow Defendants to conduct additional discovery from Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP ("DPW"); (2) attempt to obtain the Missing Documents (as that term is defined in Defendants' Motion) from Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") with Plaintiff's assistance; and (3) thereafter, allow the Parties to submit supplemental briefing in light thereof;

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, the Court ordered supplemental discovery and briefing (Dkt. 229);

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2012, Kristofor Henning of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, counsel for HP, informed counsel for Defendants that HP had located one or more disks and approximately 20 boxes of hard copy documents, two of which it had reviewed, that potentially contain documents on the list of Missing Documents (collectively, the "Found Materials");

WHEREAS, after having conferred with one another, the Parties agreed at that time that, given the uncertainty as to what the Found Materials may contain and the degree to which they match the Missing Document list, if at all, supplemental briefing by Defendants and/or Plaintiff on the then-current schedule would have been premature;

WHEREAS, on July 9, 2012, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed order granting a ten-day extension of the briefing schedule under the Court's June 12 Order (Dkt. 235);

WHEREAS, on July 9, 2012, the Court granted such extension (Dkt. 236);

WHEREAS, between July 9 and 18, 2012, the Parties worked diligently with Mr. Henning in requesting an opportunity to inspect the Found Materials;

WHEREAS, counsel for HP agreed to make the Found Materials available to the SEC for it to determine which, if any, of the Found Materials contained documents identified as missing and to produce any such documents to Defendants;

WHEREAS, by approximately July 18, 2012, HP had shipped the boxes of materials to Morgan Lewis's office in Washington, D.C., for the SEC to review;

WHEREAS, by the afternoon of July 18, 2012, SEC counsel had determined that the Found Materials contained at least some of the Missing Documents but that the SEC would need a further day to finish cataloging the Found Materials;

WHEREAS, the SEC received an additional three boxes of documents from Morgan Lewis on July 19, 2012;

WHEREAS, by the afternoon of July 19, 2012, SEC counsel had determined that at least 61,000 pages of the Missing Documents had been located but that certain hard drives, which counsel for the SEC believed might contain the remaining or at least additional Missing Documents, had not been located;

WHEREAS, SEC counsel stated that he had asked counsel for HP to re-search its records to determine if it had any of the aforementioned missing hard drives;

WHEREAS, after conferring the evening of July 19, 2012 and morning of July 20, 2012, the Parties agree that any supplemental briefing would be premature in light of the continuing uncertainty as to how many Missing Documents the SEC may be able to recover from HP;

WHEREAS, under the Court's July 9th Order, Defendants' supplemental brief would be due today (Dkt. 236); and

WHEREAS, the Parties believe it is appropriate to further extend the time for filing of supplemental briefing and prefer, if possible and convenient to the Court, to keep the currently scheduled August 3, 2012 hearing date;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, to further extend the time for filing of supplemental briefing as follows:

Defendants' Supplemental Brief due: July 26, 2012 Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief due: August 1, 2012 Hearing: August 3, 2012, 10:00 a.m. (or as soon as practicable thereafter)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, X

I, James A. Meyers, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.

Dated: July 20, 2012 /s/ ---------------------------------------- James A. Meyers Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Counsel for Susan Skaer

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer