LEVY v. ZUCKERBERG, 12-cv-03642-MMC. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120815923
Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2012
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER DEFERRING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO REMAND STAY MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Having read and considered Plaintiff Lidia Levy's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Administrative Motion to Defer Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pending Resolution of Motion to defendants' response thereto Remand, and good cause appearing therefore , IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion is
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER DEFERRING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO REMAND STAY MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Having read and considered Plaintiff Lidia Levy's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Administrative Motion to Defer Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pending Resolution of Motion to defendants' response thereto Remand, and good cause appearing therefore , IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion is ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER DEFERRING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO REMAND STAY
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Having read and considered Plaintiff Lidia Levy's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Administrative Motion to Defer Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pending Resolution of Motion to defendants' response thereto Remand, and good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The motion is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff need not respond to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed herein on August 2, 2012 unless and until both Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Defendants' Motion to Stay is are denied; the September 7, 2012 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. Motion to Stay is
3. In the event the pending Motions to Remand and Stay are denied, Defendants shall the Court will set a briefing schedule and hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss. immediately re-set and re-notice the hearing on their Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff shall have Fourteen (14) days to file any memorandum opposing the Motion to Dismiss; and Defendants shall thereafter have Seven (7) days to file any reply in support thereof.
Source: Leagle
