Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CITY OF OMAHA POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., 5:11-cv-04003-LHK. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20120827695 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2012
Summary: NOTICE OF LODGING OF [ PROPOSED] CORRECTED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING(S) LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Lead Plaintiffs, the City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Bristol Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs"), hereby submit the attached [Proposed] Corrected Order Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings to correct a typographical error in the Order entered by the Court on August 10, 2012 (ECF No. 86),
More

NOTICE OF LODGING OF [PROPOSED] CORRECTED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING(S)

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

Lead Plaintiffs, the City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Bristol Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs"), hereby submit the attached [Proposed] Corrected Order Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings to correct a typographical error in the Order entered by the Court on August 10, 2012 (ECF No. 86), pursuant to the parties' Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleadings filed herein on August 9, 2012 (ECF No. 85).

Specifically, due to inadvertence of counsel for Plaintiffs, whereas the text of the parties' August 9, 2012 Stipulation recited that Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint was extended to Monday, August 20, 2012, and that: "the parties agreed to allow Defendants to file their responsive pleading(s) on Monday, September 17, 2012, Plaintiffs until October 15, 2012 to file any opposition and Defendants until November 1, 2012 to file any reply in support of those responsive pleading(s)" the Proposed Order provided to the Court with the stipulation incorrectly included only the deadlines for the filing of the Second Amended Complaint and for the filing of Defendants' response(s) to the Second Amended Complaint, without providing for the filing of Plaintiffs' opposition(s) or Defendants' replies in support of those responses.

The revised Proposed Order submitted herewith corrects that error and Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Proposed Order be entered as the Court's Corrected Order.

PROPOSED] CORRECTED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING[S]

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Second Amended Complaint is hereby extended through and including Monday, August 20, 2012; Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading(s) is Monday, September 17, 2012; Plaintiffs' deadline to file their opposition to any responsive pleading(s) is Monday, October 15, 2012; and Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading(s) is Thursday, November 1, 2012.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer