Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. 24/94 KG BAGS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, 3:12-cv-04369-EDL. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121018b12 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2012
Summary: CONSENT DECREE OF CONDEMNATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge. On August 20, 2012, the United States of America, by and through its attorneys, filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem ("Complaint") against the above-captioned articles. The articles proceeded against are articles of food within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("the Act"), 21 U.S.C. 321(f). The Complaint alleges that the seized articles are adulterated while he
More

CONSENT DECREE OF CONDEMNATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.

On August 20, 2012, the United States of America, by and through its attorneys, filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem ("Complaint") against the above-captioned articles. The articles proceeded against are articles of food within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("the Act"), 21 U.S.C. § 321(f). The Complaint alleges that the seized articles are adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce, within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4), in that they have been held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have become contaminated with filth.

In response to the Complaint, on August 21, 2012, this Court issued a Warrant for Arrest In Rem directing the United States Marshal for this district ("U.S. Marshal") to seize the articles. The U.S. Marshal executed the seizure on August 21, 2012. Thereafter, the United States caused notice of the Complaint and seizure to be published in accordance with the applicable rules of this Court and Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On August 23, 2012, San Francisco Herb and Natural Food Company ("Claimant") filed a verified claim to the seized articles ("Condemned Articles"). Claimant filed a First Amended Verified Statement of Interest on August 29, 2012, and an Answer on September 12, 2012. In consenting to the entry of this Consent Decree, Claimant's Chief Executive Officer and President Barry Meltzer and its Chief Operating Officer Fahimeh Niroomand have neither admitted nor denied any allegation in the Complaint, and nothing in this Consent Decree is an admission by either of them or by Claimant (collectively, "Defendants") that they have committed any violation of the Act. Claimant and Defendants acknowledge and agree that they have entered into this civil Consent Decree voluntarily and that it does not address or limit, in any respect, any other actions, including criminal proceedings or civil claims, of the United States or any agency thereof.

Claimant agrees to indemnify and hold the United States harmless should any party or parties hereafter file or seek to file a claim or to intervene in this action and obtain the Condemned Articles. Claimant and Defendants, having appeared and voluntarily consented to the entry of this Decree without contest, before any testimony has been taken, and waiving the filing and service of an amended complaint seeking injunctive relief, and the United States having consented to this Decree:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter herein and has personal jurisdiction over all parties to this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 334. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-(c) and 1395.

2. The seized articles are articles of food that are adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce, within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(4), in that they have been held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have become contaminated with filth.

3. The seized articles are hereby condemned pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 334(a) and forfeited to the United States.

4. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 334(e), Claimant shall pay to the United States all court costs and fees, storage, and other proper expenses of this proceeding incurred to date, including, but not limited to, those incurred by the U.S. Marshal, and such additional expenses as may hereinafter be incurred and taxed. Claimant shall pay these costs within ten (10) business days after receiving notice of such costs from the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), the U.S. Marshal, or the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California.

5. Within twenty (20) calendar days of the entry of this Decree, Claimant shall execute and file with the clerk of this Court a good and sufficient penal bond (the "Bond") with surety in the amount of five hundred eighty five thousand and two hundred dollars ($585,200) to be applied to Lot 1 (as described in Subpart A of Paragraph 9 of this Decree), and held for application to succeeding Lots 2-10 (as described in Subparts B-J of Paragraph 9 of this Decree). The Bond shall be in a form acceptable to the clerk of this Court and payable to the United States of America, and conditioned on Claimant's abiding by and performing all of the terms and conditions of this Decree and of such further orders and decrees as may be entered in this proceeding.

6. After paying the costs pursuant to paragraph 4 and posting the Bond with the clerk of this Court pursuant to paragraph 5, Claimant shall give written notice to FDA at the address listed in paragraph 30 that Claimant, at its own expense, is prepared to attempt to bring the Condemned Articles into compliance with the law under the supervision of a duly authorized FDA representative.

7. Claimant shall either: (a) submit to FDA evidence that it will no longer use the facility located at 47444 Kato Road, Fremont, CA (the "Kato Road Facility"), for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food; or (b) in the event that Claimant elects to use the Kato Road Facility for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food, clean and renovate, at its own expense, the Kato Road Facility and render it sanitary and fit for the storage and handling of articles of food, and thereafter, submit a written request to FDA for an inspection of the Kato Road Facility. Following receipt of Claimant's request, FDA will conduct an inspection of the Kato Road Facility to determine whether it is sanitary and fit for the proper storage and handling of articles of food and will promptly inform Claimant, in writing, of the results of that inspection.

8. Claimant shall not commence, permit any other person to commence, or cause any other person to commence attempting to bring the Condemned Articles into compliance with the law unless and until Claimant: (a) receives notice from FDA, in writing, that either it has submitted adequate evidence to FDA that it will no longer use the Kato Road Facility for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food, or it appears, based on FDA's inspection, that the Kato Road Facility has been made sanitary and fit for the proper storage and handling of articles of food; (b) submits a written statement to FDA detailing the proposed plan to bring the Condemned Articles into compliance (the "Reconditioning Plan"), which includes, but is not limited to, either rendering the Kato Road Facility sanitary and fit for the proper storage and handling of articles of food or moving the Condemned Articles to another location, approved by FDA, for reconditioning; (c) receives written approval of the Reconditioning Plan from FDA; and (d) receives written authorization from FDA to commence reconditioning. FDA's decisions regarding the adequacy of evidence that Claimant will no longer use the Kato Road Facility for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food, the cleanliness of the Kato Road Facility, and the Reconditioning Plan shall be final.

9. The U.S. Marshal, upon receiving notice from the United States Attorney for this District that Claimant is authorized to commence reconditioning, shall release the appropriate Lot of Articles (as described in Subparts A-J, below) to the custody of Claimant in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth as follows:

A. The Condemned Articles in Lot 1, consisting of approximately 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 1 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

B. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 1 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 2, consisting of approximately a second 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 2 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

C. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 2 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 3, consisting of approximately a third 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 3 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

D. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 3 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 4, consisting of approximately a fourth 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 4 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

E. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 4 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 5, consisting of approximately a fifth 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 5 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

F. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 5 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 6, consisting of approximately a sixth 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 6 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

G. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 6 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 7, consisting of approximately a seventh 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 7 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

H. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 7 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 8, consisting of approximately an eighth 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 8 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

I. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 8 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 9, consisting of approximately a ninth 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 9 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

J. If and only if Claimant complies with all of the terms of this Consent Decree with respect to Lot 9 and has paid all costs assessed to date pursuant to paragraph 22, the Condemned Articles in Lot 10, consisting of the remaining 1/10 of the Condemned Articles (by value), to be further designated by the FDA representative in consultation with Claimant, shall be released to Claimant for the sole purpose of attempting to bring the Condemned Articles in Lot 10 into compliance with the law pursuant to the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8.

10. Claimant shall at all times, until the Condemned Articles have been released in writing by an FDA representative, retain the Condemned Articles intact for examination or inspection by an FDA representative in a place made known to and approved by FDA, and shall maintain the records or other proof necessary to establish the identity of the articles to the satisfaction of the FDA representative.

11. Within ninety (90) calendar days of receiving written authorization to commence reconditioning, Claimant shall complete its attempt to bring the Condemned Articles into compliance with the law, in accordance with the approved Reconditioning Plan described in paragraph 8 under the supervision of FDA. Claimant shall destroy, at its own expense and under the supervision of FDA, all articles of the Condemned Articles that have not been brought into compliance with the law within the ninety (90) calendar day period within ten (10) calendar days thereafter and shall file a notice with the Court certifying that such articles have been destroyed.

Because of the provisions in paragraph 9 that provide for the release of the Condemned Articles in ten (10) lots for reconditioning purposes and the administrative time that will be involved in that lot-by-lot procedure, the parties agree that the ninety (90) calendar day deadline may be reasonably expanded, from time-to-time, in its discretion by the FDA without the need for either the Claimant or the United States to file a motion with the Court.

12. Claimant shall at no time, and under no circumstances whatsoever, directly or indirectly, cause or permit the shipment, sale, offer for sale, or other disposal of any part of the Condemned Articles until: (a) FDA has had free access to the Condemned Articles in order to take any samples or make any tests or examinations that are deemed necessary; (b) FDA has released, in writing, all of the Condemned Articles for shipment, sale, or other disposition; and (c) in the event that Claimant elects to use the Kato Road Facility for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food, FDA has notified Claimant, in writing, that the Kato Road Facility has been made sanitary and fit for the proper storage and handling of articles of food.

13. Claimant shall not sell, ship, destroy, or dispose of, or permit or cause another person to sell, ship, destroy, or dispose of, the Condemned Articles or any part of them in a manner contrary to the provisions of the Act, or other laws of the United States, or of any State or Territory (as defined in the Act), in which they are disposed of or sold.

14. If Claimant breaches any condition of this Decree, or any subsequent decree or order in this proceeding, Claimant shall, at its own expense, immediately return any of the Condemned Articles that have not been released by FDA pursuant to paragraph 9 to the U.S. Marshal, or otherwise dispose of them pursuant to an order of this Court. In the event that return of any of the Condemned Articles becomes necessary pursuant to this paragraph, Claimant shall be responsible for all costs of storage and disposition incurred by the United States.

15. If Claimant does not avail itself, in the manner stated in this Decree, of the opportunity to: (a) post the Bond pursuant to paragraph 5 of this Decree; (b) submit a Reconditioning Plan for the Condemned Articles to FDA pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Decree; or (c) successfully recondition or destroy the Condemned Articles pursuant to paragraphs 8 and 11 of this Decree, the U.S. Marshal shall destroy the Condemned Articles and make due return to this Court regarding their disposition. Claimant shall bear the costs of storage and destruction incurred by the United States pursuant to this paragraph, and shall pay such costs within ten (10) calendar days of receiving an invoice from FDA.

16. Should Claimant fail to abide by and perform all the terms and conditions of this Decree with respect to disposition of the Condemned Articles, or of the Bond, or any such further order or decree as may be entered in this proceeding with respect to the disposition of the Condemned Articles, then the Bond described in paragraph 5 shall, on motion of the United States in this proceeding, be forfeited in its entirety to the United States and judgment entered thereon, and any Condemned Articles remaining in the custody of the U.S. Marshal shall be forfeited and disposed of pursuant to further order of this Court.

17. The U.S. Attorney, upon being advised by an FDA representative that all of the Condemned Articles have been brought into compliance with the Act and the requirements of this Decree, or destroyed in compliance with this Decree, and that Claimant has paid all costs submitted to Claimant as of that date, will transmit such information to the clerk of this Court, whereupon the Bond filed in this proceeding shall be returned to the Claimant.

18. Upon entry of this Decree, Defendants and each and all of their officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, successors, assigns, attorneys, and any and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them (including individuals, directors, corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates, and partnerships) are hereby restrained and enjoined under 21 U.S.C. § 332(a) from receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, and distributing at or from the Kato Road Facility, unless and until Defendants:

A. Establish and implement an effective written sanitation control program, which shall set out the details for sanitation control over the manufacturing and storage process for the Kato Road Facility, and all food handling and storage equipment therein. The written sanitation control program shall be designed to ensure that the Kato Road Facility and all equipment therein are maintained continuously in a sanitary condition to prevent conditions under which food may become contaminated with filth or whereby it may be rendered injurious to health. Defendants shall assign responsibility for the implementation of the written sanitation control program to a person or persons who, by reason of education, training, and experience in sanitation work, is competent to maintain the Kato Road Facility and all equipment therein in a sanitary condition. Defendants shall provide FDA with a copy of the written sanitation program and the name(s) of the person(s) assigned authority and responsibility for continuously implementing the program, and the written sanitation control program shall be approved in writing by FDA prior to implementation. Such program shall, at a minimum include, but not be limited to, the provisions of subparagraphs (B)-(F) of this paragraph;

B. Thoroughly clean, sanitize, renovate, and render the Kato Road Facility and all equipment therein suitable for use in receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, and distributing articles of food, and institute procedures to ensure that the Kato Road Facility and equipment therein are maintained continuously in such condition;

C. Remove from the Kato Road Facility and all equipment therein rodents, insects, other pests, the filth contributed by them, and microbial and physical contaminants, and adequately repair the floors, ceilings, walls, doors, windows, and building in order to prevent rodents, insects, or other pests from entering the Kato Road Facility;

D. Ensure that the grounds in the immediate vicinity of the Kato Road Facility are adequately maintained, including, but not limited to, removing litter and waste, and cutting weeds and grass that may constitute an attractant, breeding place or harborage for rodents and other pests;

E. Establish adequate methods and controls for receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, and distributing articles of food in the Kato Road Facility that are designed to ensure that articles of food do not become contaminated by pests, or with filth, or microbial or physical contaminants;

F. Establish a regularly scheduled employee training program (no less frequently than every six months) that includes, at a minimum, instruction on sanitary food handling techniques and personal hygiene practices;

G. Report to FDA in writing that Defendants have fully complied with the terms of subparagraphs (A)-(F) of this paragraph; and

H. Receive written notification from FDA stating that Defendants appear to be in compliance with the Act, applicable regulations, and this Decree, and authorizing Defendants to resume operations.

19. Within thirty (30) calendar days after FDA has notified the firm in writing pursuant to paragraph 18(H) that it may resume operations:

A. Defendants shall retain at their expense, an independent person or persons (the "Auditor") to conduct audit inspections of the Kato Road Facility not less than once every six months for a period of two years and not less than once every twelve months for a period of three years thereafter, for a total of five years of auditing. The Auditor shall be qualified by education, training, and experience to conduct such inspections, and shall be without personal or financial ties (other than the consulting agreement) to any of the Defendants, any San Francisco Herb and Natural Food Company officer or employee, or their immediate families. Defendants shall notify FDA of the Auditor's qualifications in writing as soon as the Auditor is retained.

B. The audit shall evaluate whether Defendants are in compliance with the Act and applicable regulations, including, but not limited to, whether: (i) there is evidence of rodents, insects, or other pests in the food storage areas; (ii) Defendants have adequately closed off entryways for rodents, insects, or other pests; (iii) food is stored an appropriate distance from the walls to minimize infestations by rodents, insects, or other pests; (iv) employees follow proper sanitation procedures; and (v) there is evidence of overcrowding that would contribute to infestation by rodents, insects, or other pests.

C. At the conclusion of each audit inspection, the Auditor shall prepare a written audit report (the "Audit Report") identifying in detail any deviations from the Act and applicable regulations ("Audit Report Observations"). As part of every Audit Report, except the first Audit Report, the Auditor shall assess the adequacy of corrective actions taken by Defendants to correct all previous Audit Report Observations. The Audit Reports shall be delivered contemporaneously to Defendants and FDA by courier service or overnight delivery service, no later than ten (10) calendar days after the date each audit inspection is completed. If an Audit Report contains any Audit Report Observations, FDA may, in its discretion, require that the five year auditing cycle begin anew. In addition, Defendants shall maintain the complete Audit Reports and all of their underlying data in separate files at the Kato Road Facility and shall make the Audit Reports and underlying data available to FDA upon request.

D. If an Audit Report contains any Audit Report Observations, Defendants shall, within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the Audit Report, correct those observations, unless FDA notifies them that a shorter time period is necessary. If, after receiving the Audit Report, Defendants believe that correction of an Audit Report Observation will take longer than ten (10) calendar days, Defendants shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Audit Report, propose to FDA a schedule for completing corrections ("Correction Schedule") and provide justification describing why the additional time is necessary. If FDA does not approve Defendants' proposed Correction Schedule, Defendants shall correct the Audit Report Observations within three (3) calendar days of receiving notice of FDA's disapproval. Defendants shall complete all corrections according to the approved Correction Schedule. Within thirty (30) calendar days of Defendants' receipt of an Audit Report, or within the time period provided in a Correction Schedule approved by FDA, the Auditor shall review the actions taken by Defendants to correct the Audit Report Observations. Within ten (10) calendar days of the beginning of that review, the Auditor shall report in writing to FDA whether each of the Audit Report Observations has been corrected.

20. If, at any time after entry of this Decree, FDA determines, based on the results of an inspection, sample analysis, Audit Report, or other information, that Defendants have failed to comply with any provision of this Decree, have violated the Act or applicable regulations, or that additional corrective actions are necessary to achieve compliance with this Decree, the Act, or applicable regulations, FDA may, as and when it deems necessary, notify Defendants in writing of the noncompliance and order Defendants to take appropriate action, including but not limited to ordering them to take one or more of the following actions immediately:

A. Cease receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, or distributing articles of food until Defendants receive written notification from FDA that they appear to be in compliance with the Decree, the Act, and applicable regulations, and that Defendants may resume operations;

B. Recall articles of food that have been distributed or are under the custody and control of Defendants' agents, customers, or consumers;

C. Submit samples of articles of food to a qualified laboratory to determine whether the food is contaminated with filth; and

D. Take any other corrective actions as FDA deems necessary to protect the public health or bring Defendants into compliance with this Decree, the Act, and applicable regulations, including, but not limited to, requiring that Defendants reimplement or reinstitute any of the requirements of this Decree.

The provisions of this paragraph shall be apart from, and in addition to, all other remedies available to FDA. Defendants shall pay all costs of recalls and other corrective actions, including the costs of FDA's supervision, inspections, investigations, analyses, examinations, and reviews to implement and monitor recalls and other corrective actions, at the rates specified in paragraph 22 of this Decree.

21. Upon entry of this Decree, Defendants and each and all of their officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, successors, assigns, attorneys, and any and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them (including individuals, directors, corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates, and partnerships) who receive actual notice of this Decree, are permanently restrained and enjoined under the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 332(a) from directly or indirectly doing or causing any act that: (a) violates the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 331(a), by introducing, or delivering for introduction, into interstate commerce articles of food that are adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 342; or (b) violates the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 331(k), by causing articles of food to be adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 342 while such articles are held for sale after shipment of one or more ingredients in interstate commerce.

22. Defendants other than Defendant Niroomand shall reimburse the United States for the costs of supervising Defendants' compliance with the terms of this Decree, including Defendants' reconditioning or destruction of the Condemned Articles, and for costs associated with any inspections, examinations, reviews, evaluations, and analyses conducted pursuant to this Decree, at the standard rates prevailing at the time the activities are accomplished. As of the date this Decree is signed by the parties, the rates are $87.57 per hour or fraction thereof per representative for time spent on supervision other than laboratory and analytical work; $104.96 per hour or fraction thereof per representative for laboratory and analytical work; and $0.555 per mile for travel expenses. In the event that the standard rates generally applicable to FDA's supervision of court-ordered compliance are modified, these rates shall be increased or decreased without further order of this Court.

23. Representatives of FDA shall be permitted, without prior notice and as and when FDA deems necessary, to make inspections of the Kato Road Facility and any other location at or from which Defendants, now or in the future, receive, manufacture, prepare, process, pack, hold, or distribute articles of food (collectively the "facilities"), and, without prior notice, take any other measures necessary to monitor and ensure continuing compliance with the terms of this Decree. During such inspections, FDA representatives shall be permitted access to buildings, equipment, articles of food, containers, and packaging material(s) therein; to take photographs and make video recordings; to take samples of Defendants' articles of food, containers, and packaging material(s); to examine and copy all records relating to the receiving, manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, holding, and distributing of any and all articles of food, and to the sanitation of the facilities. The inspections shall be permitted upon presenting a copy of this Decree and appropriate credentials. The inspection authority granted by this Decree is separate from, and in addition to, the authority to make inspections under the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 374.

24. Defendants shall abide by the decisions of FDA and its representatives, which shall be final. All decisions specified in this Decree shall be vested in FDA's discretion and, if necessary, shall be reviewed by this Court pursuant to the arbitrary and capricious standard as set forth in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). Review by a court of any FDA decision rendered pursuant to this Decree shall be conducted without any discovery and shall be based exclusively upon the written record that was before FDA at the time of the decision.

25. Defendants shall provide a copy of this Decree, personally or by registered mail, within ten (10) calendar days from the date of entry of the Decree, to each of Defendants' officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, successors, assigns, and attorneys. Defendants shall also post a copy of this Decree in the employee common areas at the Kato Road Facility as long as it remains in effect. Within thirty-five (35) calendar days of the date of entry of this Decree, Defendants shall provide to FDA an affidavit of compliance, stating the facts and manner of compliance with the provisions of this paragraph.

26. Upon entry of this Decree, Defendants shall report to FDA in writing the location of the facilities at which they hold articles of food. If, at that time, Defendants have no facilities other than the Kato Road Facility, they shall state that fact to FDA in writing. Following entry of this Decree, Defendants shall immediately notify FDA in writing of the location of any new facility or facilities at which they hold food.

27. Defendants shall notify FDA in writing at least thirty (30) calendar days before any subsequent change in location, ownership, or character of their business, such as reorganization, dissolution, assignment, or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation or business entity, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, or any other change in the corporate or business structure of any newly-formed business entity (including any "doing business as" entity) over which Defendants have any authority, or the sale or assignment of any business assets, such as buildings, equipment, or inventory, that may affect compliance with this Decree. Defendants shall provide a copy of this Decree to any successor or assignee at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the assignment or change in ownership. Defendants shall furnish FDA with an affidavit of compliance with this paragraph at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to such assignment or change in ownership.

28. If any Defendant fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Decree, including any time frame imposed by this Decree, then, on motion of the United States in this proceeding, Defendants other than Defendant Niroomand shall pay to the United States of America the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000) in liquidated damages for each day such violation continues and an additional sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) in liquidated damages for each violation of the Act, its implementing regulations, and/or this Decree.

29. Should the United States bring, and prevail in, a contempt action to enforce the terms of this Decree, Defendants agree to pay all attorneys' fees, travel expenses incurred by attorneys and witnesses, court costs, expert witness fees, and investigational and analytical expenses incurred in bringing such an action.

30. All notifications, correspondence, and communications to FDA required by the terms of this Decree shall be addressed to the District Director, San Francisco District Office, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway, Alameda, CA 94502-7096.

31. This Consent Decree constitutes the entire agreement between each of the undersigned Parties, and cannot be amended, except in writing and signed by each of the undersigned Parties to this Consent Decree, and approved by the Court.

32. This Court retains jurisdiction to issue such further decrees and orders as may be necessary to the proper disposition of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. I, Melanie L. Proctor, hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of all signatories whose signatures are represented by a conformed/s/ signature in the filing of this document.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer