JENKINS v. CITY OF RICHMOND, C-08-03401 EMC. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121102756
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF CLEVELAND BROWN EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that Cleveland Brown hereby dismisses, with prejudice, his claims in the above-captioned action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(a)(i) and in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement signed by Plaintiff Brown on October 11, 2012. ORDER PURSUANT TO ST
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF CLEVELAND BROWN EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that Cleveland Brown hereby dismisses, with prejudice, his claims in the above-captioned action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(a)(i) and in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement signed by Plaintiff Brown on October 11, 2012. ORDER PURSUANT TO STI..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF CLEVELAND BROWN
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that Cleveland Brown hereby dismisses, with prejudice, his claims in the above-captioned action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(a)(i) and in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement signed by Plaintiff Brown on October 11, 2012.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, the Court hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims of Cleveland Brown in Case No. C 08-03401 EMC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
