Filed: Nov. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2012
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Marcos Vargas, Romualdo Altamirano, Pedro Ramos, Bulmaro Bazan, Marcos Mandujano, Jose Solis, Luis Pena, Benito Chairez, Figueroa, Fredy Rocha, Salvador Flores, Ismael Corona, Epigmenio Lopez, Juan Corona, Enrique Tamayo, Francisco Salgado, Silverio Torres, Marti
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Marcos Vargas, Romualdo Altamirano, Pedro Ramos, Bulmaro Bazan, Marcos Mandujano, Jose Solis, Luis Pena, Benito Chairez, Figueroa, Fredy Rocha, Salvador Flores, Ismael Corona, Epigmenio Lopez, Juan Corona, Enrique Tamayo, Francisco Salgado, Silverio Torres, Martin..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Marcos Vargas, Romualdo Altamirano, Pedro Ramos, Bulmaro Bazan, Marcos Mandujano, Jose Solis, Luis Pena, Benito Chairez, Figueroa, Fredy Rocha, Salvador Flores, Ismael Corona, Epigmenio Lopez, Juan Corona, Enrique Tamayo, Francisco Salgado, Silverio Torres, Martin Ramos Ramirez, Angel Sanchez, Eron Lopez, Eduardo Vargas, Jorge Soto, Rigoberto Sanchez, Julio Lopez, Jose J. Garcia, Pedro Sierra, Damacio Sanchez, Juan Guerra, Jaime Martinez Jr., Robert Montoya, Mateo Guzman, Lazaro Maya, Jose Estrada, Aniceto Almanza Sanchez, Emilio Vargas, Jose Antonio Alvarez, Antonio Rodriguez, Joseph Renee Rodriguez, Mauricio Sanchez, Mauricio Sanchez Arzate, Manuel Renteria, Miguel Suchil Mendoza, and Vicente Martinez, (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants John Earl Redfern, J. Redfern, Inc. (dba Golden State Landscaping), JLS Partners, Inc. (dba GSL Construction), and Empire Landscape Construction (collectively "Defendants") agree and stipulate, through their respective counsel, to the following extension and continuance:
1. The parties are currently discussing settlement, and thus, they would like to direct their resources and time to such negotiations.
2. The parties have agreed that Defendants' responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' complaint will be filed on or before January 11, 2013;
3. The parties request a continuance of the Case Management Conference, which is currently set for December 13, 2012, by approximately 60 days or to a later date and time that is convenient for the Court.
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that this Court order the following:
1. The deadline for Defendants to file their responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' complaint is set for January 11, 20132.
2. The Case Management Conference current schedule for December 13, 2012, be continued to February 15, 2013, or to a date that is convenient for the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
