LEVENHAGEN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, C12-0435 SC. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121126536
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John D. Levenhagen by and through his attorney of record, Jay Chafetz of Law Offices of Jay Chafetz and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pu
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John D. Levenhagen by and through his attorney of record, Jay Chafetz of Law Offices of Jay Chafetz and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pur..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1)
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John D. Levenhagen by and through his attorney of record, Jay Chafetz of Law Offices of Jay Chafetz and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1).
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
