STIPULATION RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [Civ. L.R. 7-11]

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

The parties through their respective counsel of record enter into the following stipulation regarding Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Extend Time in which to file and serve an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. [Doc. No. 68.]_("Administrative Motion").

Whereas, Defendants opposed Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Extend Time in which to file and serve an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 69) ("Opposition") on several grounds, including the lack of a meet and confer regarding the requested relief under Local Rule 7-11.

Whereas, upon Plaintiffs' request and after Defendants filed their Opposition, Plaintiffs and Defendants participated in a meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs' requested relief in Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion on November 10, 2012.

Whereas, in entering into this stipulation, Defendants do not stipulate that Plaintiffs have shown good cause to extend the time in which to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions;

Whereas, Defendants do not stipulate to Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time in Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion in which to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions.;

Whereas, Plaintiffs have sought in their Administrative Motion an extension of time in which to file an Opposition to the Motion for Sanctions and set forth a proposed briefing schedule;

The parties hereby stipulate to the proposed briefing schedule for Opposition and Reply Briefs in response to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions [Doc. No. 57] if and only if the Court grants Plaintiffs the relief sought in their Administrative Motion to the following briefing schedule:

SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.