STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation ("ViewSonic") filed a Second Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") in Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI (N.D. Cal.) on October 8, 2012;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on October 22, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7023);

WHEREAS, the Court granted the motion in part and denied it in part on November 28, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7255);

WHEREAS, Defendants desire additional time to answer the Complaint;

WHEREAS, extending Defendants' time to answer the Complaint will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court;

THEREFORE, ViewSonic and Defendants, by their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. All Defendants shall answer the Complaint by December 19, 2012.

2. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by any Defendant of any substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

3. This stipulation shall not be used by any Party in support of or opposition to any arguments related to scheduling in this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Attestation: The filer of this document asserts that the concurrence of the signatories thereto has been obtained.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause appearing,

IT IS SO ORDERED.