Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STEINFELD v. DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, 3:12-cv-01118-JSW. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121214876 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2012
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FROM DECEMBER 11, 2012 TO FEBRUARY 11, 2013 AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JANUARY 18, 2013 TO MARCH 15, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Plaintiff Andrew Steinfeld ("Steinfeld") and Defendants Discover Financial Services, DFS Financial Services, LLC, and Discover Bank (collectively, "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FROM DECEMBER 11, 2012 TO FEBRUARY 11, 2013 AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JANUARY 18, 2013 TO MARCH 15, 2013

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Andrew Steinfeld ("Steinfeld") and Defendants Discover Financial Services, DFS Financial Services, LLC, and Discover Bank (collectively, "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties have mediated before the Honorable Carl West (Ret.) of JAMS and have reached an agreement in principle; and

WHEREAS, the parties seek to continue the deadline for Defendants to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and postpone the Initial Case Management Conference in order to finalize the terms of the settlement agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff Steinfeld, by his undersigned counsel, and Defendants, by their undersigned counsel, that the last day for Defendants to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be continued from December 11, 2012 to February 11, 2013. The Initial Case Management Conference shall be postponed until March 15, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED ABOVE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer