Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE APPLE AND AT&T iPAD UNLIMITED DATA PLAN LITIGATION, 5:10-cv-02553 RMW. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121214939 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING APPLE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED MASTER CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek ("plaintiffs") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint ("FAMCC") in the above-captioned case; WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties
More

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING APPLE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED MASTER CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek ("plaintiffs") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint ("FAMCC") in the above-captioned case;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Apple's response to the FAMCC would be due November 28, 2012;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are engaged in productive settlement discussions and have made substantial progress towards resolving this matter;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple's time to respond to the FAMCC to permit additional time for settlement discussions;

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court;

THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple's time to respond is extended until December 28, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer