Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHAO v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, CV-10-3118-SBA. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121217588 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2012
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiffs Mauder and Alice Chao, Deogeneso and Glorina Palugod, and Maritza Pinel (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and defendant Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree, and request the Court modify the pre-trial schedule, as follows. This putative class action concerns Aurora's mortgage loan "workout agreements," also known as "special forbea
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mauder and Alice Chao, Deogeneso and Glorina Palugod, and Maritza Pinel (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and defendant Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree, and request the Court modify the pre-trial schedule, as follows.

This putative class action concerns Aurora's mortgage loan "workout agreements," also known as "special forbearance agreements." The Parties incorporate by reference their respective factual statements of the case from their prior joint submissions. See Doc. ## 59, 92, 132

On November 16, 2012, pursuant to the existing pre-trial schedule (Doc. # 136), Plaintiffs filed their Renewed Motion for Class Certification. Doc. # 149 ("Renewed Motion").

Since Plaintiffs filed their Renewed Motion, Aurora has taken the depositions of each of the named Plaintiffs. Additionally, Judge Beeler has ordered Aurora to produce certain payment data (Doc. # 155), and Plaintiffs have served an additional interrogatory seeking more payment data.

Under the current schedule, Aurora's opposition to the Renewed Motion is due on December 28, 2012. See Doc. # 136.

In light of the upcoming holidays, the press of work following the recent depositions, and Plaintiffs' requests for additional data, Aurora believes a brief extension of its deadline to oppose Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Class Certification is warranted. Plaintiffs do not object to Aurora's request, so long as they are given additional time to file their reply brief in support of the Renewed Motion. Accordingly, the Parties hereby request that the Court amend the existing briefing schedule and reschedule the existing hearing date as follows:

Matter Current Date1 Proposed Date Aurora files Opposition to Renewed Motion for Class Certification December 28, 2012 January 7, 2012 Plaintiffs file Reply in Support of Renewed Motion for Class Certification January 21, 2012 January 30, 2012 February 12, 2013 Class Certification Hearing January 29, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. (or as at 1:00 p.m. otherwise set by the Court)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs and Aurora, upon consent of the Court, that:

The briefing schedule and hearing date are MODIFIED as set forth herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The "Current Date[s]" are derived from the Court's Order Modifying Pre-Trial Schedule. Doc. # 136.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer