Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FORKNER v. UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, C12-03258-PJH. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130107d43 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2012
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PRODEDRURE 41(a) (1) (A) (ii) PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Manford C. Forkner and Defendant Unifund Partners hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice as to all Defendants, with each side to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a) (1) (A) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PRODEDRURE 41(a) (1) (A) (ii)

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Manford C. Forkner and Defendant Unifund Partners hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice as to all Defendants, with each side to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a) (1) (A) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer