Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MARSH v. ZAAZOOM SOLUTIONS, LLC, 4:11-cv-05226-YGR. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130211905 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DATE YVONNE GONZALEZ, District Judge. STIPULATION TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: It is hereby stipulated, by and between plaintiffs AMBER KRISTI MARSH and STACIE EVANS ("Plaintiffs") and defendants FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE, ZAAZOOM SOLUTIONS, LLC, ZAZA PAY LLC, MULTIECOM, LLC, ONLINE RESOURCE CENTER, LLC, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CENTRAL TEXAS, JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CHECKI
More

STIPULATION CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DATE

YVONNE GONZALEZ, District Judge.

STIPULATION

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

It is hereby stipulated, by and between plaintiffs AMBER KRISTI MARSH and STACIE EVANS ("Plaintiffs") and defendants FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE, ZAAZOOM SOLUTIONS, LLC, ZAZA PAY LLC, MULTIECOM, LLC, ONLINE RESOURCE CENTER, LLC, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CENTRAL TEXAS, JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CHECKING, INC., and DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, LLC ("Defendants") by and through their respective attorneys of record, that the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") is extended to and includes January 10, 2013. This Stipulation is based upon the following facts:

1. On December 13, 2012, this Court issued its Order granting in part and denying in part defendants First National Bank of Central Texas and First Bank of Delaware's motions to dismiss the TAC and denying defendant Zaazoom Solutions LLC and Jack Henry & Associates' motions to dismiss the TAC.

2. The current date by which Defendants must respond to the TAC is December 27, 2012.

3. The stipulated extension by which Defendants must respond to the TAC will accommodate the parties' and their counsels' previously scheduled holiday travel arrangements.

4. This stipulation for a two week extension of time to respond to the TAC will not alter or affect the date of any event or deadline already set by the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer