Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SIERRA BAY CONTRACTORS, INC. v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:10-CV-04611-RS. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130226g06 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY'S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, IN EXCHANGE FOR A WAIVER OF COSTS RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, third-party defendant and cross-claimant Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale"), and cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), have agreed and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of Scottsdale's Cross-Claim again
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY'S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, IN EXCHANGE FOR A WAIVER OF COSTS

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, third-party defendant and cross-claimant Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale"), and cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), have agreed and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of Scottsdale's Cross-Claim against Lexington, with prejudice, subject to said parties' mutual waiver of costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Having reviewed the above stipulation, the Court orders that cross-defendant Lexington Insurance Company be dismissed, with prejudice, from Scottsdale Insurance Company's cross-claim, with each side to bear its own fees and costs.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer