GORDON v. THE HOME DEPOT, CV 11-06294 RMW. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130226g13
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) DQG#RUGHU RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already addresses each party's obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs. ORDER The Court having read and
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) DQG#RUGHU RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already addresses each party's obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs. ORDER The Court having read and c..
More
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)
DQG#RUGHU
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already addresses each party's obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs.
ORDER
The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court acknowledges that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement that addresses the payment of their respective fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
