Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CITY OF OAKLAND v. HOLDER, CV 12-3566 MEJ (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130104691 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RENOTICE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO RESET DEADLINES FOR ASSOCIATED BRIEFING MARIA ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge. WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the hearing on said motion for January 17, 2013; WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition to the defendants' motion must be filed by December 24, 2012 and defendants' reply to plaintiffs' opposition must be filed by December
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RENOTICE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO RESET DEADLINES FOR ASSOCIATED BRIEFING

MARIA ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the hearing on said motion for January 17, 2013;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition to the defendants' motion must be filed by December 24, 2012 and defendants' reply to plaintiffs' opposition must be filed by December 31, 2012;

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2012, defendants' counsel contacted plaintiff's counsel seeking a stipulation to renotice the defendants' motion to dismiss for January 31, 2013 and to extend the briefing schedule; and

WHEREAS, counsel have agreed to move the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss to January 31, 2013, and arrived at a mutually agreeable briefing schedule.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that:

1. At defendants' request, the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is hereby renoticed for January 31, 2013 at 10:00am before the Honorable Magistrate Judge James in Courtroom B.

2. The deadline for plaintiff to file its opposition to the motion to dismiss is extended to January 14, 2013.

3. The deadline for defendants to file the reply in support of their motion to dismiss is extended to January 22, 2013.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer