Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JILWAN, CR 09-0417 EMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130130895 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, the United States and the defendant, Emile Youssef Jilwan, entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement whereby, as described in further detail therein, the defendant admitted and accepted responsibility for the conduct alleged in Count Thirty-Eight of the Indictment, charging him with obstruction in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1505; promised to cooperate with the government's related cases; and prom
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, the United States and the defendant, Emile Youssef Jilwan, entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement whereby, as described in further detail therein, the defendant admitted and accepted responsibility for the conduct alleged in Count Thirty-Eight of the Indictment, charging him with obstruction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505; promised to cooperate with the government's related cases; and promised to settle the forfeiture allegations charged by the United States and make all required payments pursuant to the defendant's settlement of a parallel civil enforcement action brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement, and in reliance on the defendant's promises made therein, the United States deferred its prosecution of Count Thirty-Eight; and dismissed the charges in Counts One and Thirty through Thirty-Six, as to defendant Emile Jilwan only.

WHEREAS, the Court adjourned the matter until January 23, 2013 for status and found that the period of time from January 25, 2012 to January 23, 2013 was properly excluded in computing the time within which the trial of the offense alleged in the Indictment must commence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(2) because this was a period of delay during which prosecution would be deferred by the attorney for the government pursuant to a written agreement, in this case, the January 25, 2012 Deferred Prosecution Agreement, with approval from the Court, for the purpose of allowing the defendant to demonstrate his good conduct.

WHEREAS, the Court then ordered that the status conference be adjourned one week until January 30, 2013.

WHEREAS, the Court also has scheduled the trials of two related cases, United States v. Salman and United States v. Bayyouk, to commence on June 24, 2013 and August 26, 2013, respectively.

WHEREAS, the government anticipates that Emile Jilwan may be a witness and testify at one or both trials pursuant to his promise to cooperate in good faith with the pending cases until they have been adjudicated.

WHEREAS, the parties recommend that this case be adjourned until a date that is convenient for the Court in October 2013, after the conclusion of the two pending trials.

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the status conference scheduled for January 30, 2013 shall be adjourned until October 23, 2013 and the period of time from January 23, 2013 until October 23, 2013 shall be excluded, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(2), in computing the time within which the trial of the offense alleged in the Indictment for defendant Emile Jilwan must commence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer