Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

C.K.B. v. DIXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 12cv2556 RS (DMR). (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130204629 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge. The parties to this action, through their respective attorneys of record herein, enter into this Stipulation subject to the Court's approval, with reference to the following circumstances: 1. On January 24, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("Motion") [Dkt. No. 32]. Plaint
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge.

The parties to this action, through their respective attorneys of record herein, enter into this Stipulation subject to the Court's approval, with reference to the following circumstances:

1. On January 24, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("Motion") [Dkt. No. 32]. Plaintiff's Opposition is currently due Thursday, February 7, 2013. Defendants' Reply is currently due Thursday, February 14, 2013. The hearing on the Motion is currently scheduled for Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

2. Although Plaintiff believes the Second Amended Complaint adequately states a claim upon which relief can be granted, Plaintiff also believes it would be more expedient to amend the complaint to add the detail that Defendants contend is lacking.

3. Defendants are willing to consider withdrawing their Motion on the condition that they are first given an opportunity to review Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint before it is filed.

4. The parties are willing to extend the briefing schedule and postpone the hearing on Defendants' Motion by two weeks to allow Plaintiff the opportunity to prepare, and Defendants to consider, Plaintiff's proposed Third Amended Complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(a), 6-2, and 7-12, that:

1. On or before Thursday, February 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall provide Defendants a copy of her proposed Third Amended Complaint.

2. On or before Monday, February 11, 2013, Defendants shall inform Plaintiff whether they will either (a) stipulate that Plaintiff may file the Third Amended Complaint, or (b) keep their Motion to Dismiss on file.

3. If Defendants stipulate that Plaintiff may file the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiff shall file it on Monday, February 11, 2013, and Defendants shall withdraw their Motion.

4. If Defendants do not so stipulate, and instead choose to keep their Motion on file, then the briefing schedule shall be extended by two weeks as follows: Plaintiff's opposition due on Thursday, February 21, 2013; Defendants' reply due Thursday, February 28; Hearing on Thursday, March 14, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

5. The foregoing shall be without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to seek leave of the Court to file the Third Amended Complaint in the event Defendants do not stipulate to its filing on Monday, February 11, 2013, and it shall also be without prejudice to Defendants' right to oppose such a request, if any.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 1, 2013 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: /s/ Trenton H. Norris Trenton H. Norris Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: February 1, 2013 STUBBS & LEONE By: /s/ Claudia Leed Claudia Leed Attorneys for Defendants

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer