Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PEREZ-ANGUIANO, CR12-0090 RS (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130219a21 Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON FEBRUARY 19, 2013 TO MARCH 5, 2013 AND FOR THE EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 3161 RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. This matter is currently set for a competency hearing on February 19, 2013. The parties have not been provided any report from the Bureau of Prisons regarding the results of a competency examination. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the hearing currently scheduled for February 19, 2013 be conti
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON FEBRUARY 19, 2013 TO MARCH 5, 2013 AND FOR THE EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

This matter is currently set for a competency hearing on February 19, 2013. The parties have not been provided any report from the Bureau of Prisons regarding the results of a competency examination. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the hearing currently scheduled for February 19, 2013 be continued to March 5, 2013 in order to receive and review any report resulting from the Court ordered competency examination.

The parties further agree to exclude the period of time between February 19, 2013 to March 5, 2013 from any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represent that granting the exclusion would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO STIPULATED:

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated above the Court continues the competency hearing date from February 19, 2013 to March 5, 2013.

The Court further finds that the exclusion from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 of the period from February 19, 2013 through March 5, 2013 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). Denying the requested exclusion of time would deprive the parties of the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer