DELEUSE v. ASTRUE, 12-02708 HRL. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130315904
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER (RE: DOCKET NO. 21) HOWARD L. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time up and through February 25, 2013 in which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience caused to the Court. PURSUANT TO S
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER (RE: DOCKET NO. 21) HOWARD L. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time up and through February 25, 2013 in which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience caused to the Court. PURSUANT TO ST..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER (RE: DOCKET NO. 21)
HOWARD L. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time up and through February 25, 2013 in which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience caused to the Court.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
