Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SOTO v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., 3:12-cv-1377-SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130402914 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ("Honda" or "Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and recitals: A. Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19, 2
More

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ("Honda" or "Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and recitals:

A. Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19, 2012.

B. The Court previously ordered the following briefing schedule regarding Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion for Class Certification:

• Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification April 8, 2013 • Defendant's Opposition June 10, 20131 • Plaintiff's Reply July 15, 2013

(See Docket Entry # 48 (Oct. 11, 2012).)

C. On March 25, 2013, pursuant to the Court's March 19, 2013 Order (Docket Entry # 64), counsel for the Parties met and conferred by telephone regarding the completion of Defendant's review and production of ESI in response to Plaintiffs' document requests, the scheduling of a deposition of Defendant pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), and extension of the schedule concerning briefing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification.

D. Subject to the Court's approval, the Parties herby stipulate to the following schedule by which Defendant will make up to (4) productions of ESI responsive to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents Propounded to Defendant (Aug. 30, 2012), as amended and supplemented by Plaintiffs' counsel's letter to Defendant's counsel (Oct. 24, 2012), thereby completing production by April 30, 2013:

• Defendant's Production #13 April 12, 2013 • Defendant's Production #14 April 19, 2013 • Defendant's Production #15 April 26, 2013 • Defendant's Production #16 April 30, 2013

E. Subject to the Court's approval, the Parties also stipulate to a forty-six (46) day extension of the briefing schedule regarding Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion for Class Certification in order to permit Defendant to complete its production of ESI and to permit Plaintiffs to complete the deposition(s) of Defendant pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6):

• Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification May 24, 2013 • Defendant's Opposition July 26, 2013 • Plaintiff's Reply August 30, 2013

F. No trial date has been set, and there are presently no scheduled dates that would be affected by this request.

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor, the above JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION is approved and all parties shall comply with its provisions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court's Order actually set the due date for Defendant's Opposition as "6/10/12," but the Parties presume that the Court intended to make the due date June 10, 2013, in consonance with the due dates for Plaintiffs' motion and reply brief.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer