Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HENSLEY-MacLEAN v. SAFEWAY INC., 3:11-CV-01230 RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130423931 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SAME RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to this Court's Order dated April 8, 2013 (Doc. 73), and Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Stipulation re Proposed Scheduling Order Following Filing of First Amended Complaint. As set forth in the parties Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Revise the Scheduling Order filed on April 5, 2
More

STIPULATION RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SAME

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to this Court's Order dated April 8, 2013 (Doc. 73), and Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Stipulation re Proposed Scheduling Order Following Filing of First Amended Complaint.

As set forth in the parties Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Revise the Scheduling Order filed on April 5, 2013 (Doc. 72), the parties stipulated that plaintiffs could file a First Amended Complaint in this action and vacate dates relating to the class certification process set forth in the Court's Order dated January 18, 2013 (Doc. 70). Per the Court's Order of April 8, 2013 (Doc. 73) such dates were vacated, and plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on April 16, 2013 (Doc. 74), which substituted a new plaintiff, Sara Duncan, as a proposed class representative.

Following is the parties' stipulated proposal regarding amendment of dates in this action arising out of the filing of the First Amended Complaint.

The parties propose that this Court initially schedule through a motion for class certification as follows. After the Court rules on class certification, the parties will submit proposed dates for merits discovery, dispositive motions, and trial.

1. Pre-Discovery Disclosures. The parties will exchange any information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) relating to the new plaintiff, Sara Duncan, by May 3, 2013.

2. Written Discovery. The parties will serve all new non-expert discovery requests so as to be completed by June 17, 2013. The parties agree to respond to written discovery requests within twenty (20) days rather than the thirty (30) days permitted under the FRCP. As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), reports from experts relating to class certification are due from plaintiffs by May 1, 2013, and from Safeway by July 15, 2013. Reports from rebuttal experts are due from plaintiffs by August 30, 2013.

3. Depositions. The parties will complete all non-expert depositions by July 1, 2013. Each party will complete depositions of the other party's expert(s) within 20 days of receiving expert reports (10 days for rebuttal experts) and the party producing the expert report shall make its expert available for deposition within that time.

4. Class Certification. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification shall be filed with an opening brief on or before May 1, 2013. Safeway's opposition is due on or before July 15, 2013. Plaintiffs' reply is due by August 30, 2013.

5. Hearing on Class Certification: The Court shall schedule the hearing on class certification on or after September 16, 2013. The hearing date shall be set for 9/19, 2013, at 1.30 pm.

Consumer Law Practice of Daniel T. LeBel Daniel T. LeBel Opera Plaza, Suite 2080 San Francisco, CA 94102 -and- Steven A. Skalet Craig L. Briskin Mehri & Skalet, PLLC 1250 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone (202) 822-5100 Facsimile: (202) 822-4997 -and- Whitney Stark Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone; (415) 421-1800 Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 -and- James C. Sturdevant The Sturdevant Law Firm 354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 477-2410 Facsimile: (415) 477-2420

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, Gabriel G. Gregg, hereby attest in accordance with General Order 45.X that Stephen Gardner, counsel for Plaintiffs Hensley-Maclean and Rosen, provided his concurrence with the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.

ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. By: /s/Gabriel G. Gregg JESSE F. RUIZ GABRIEL G. GREGG Attorneys for Defendant SAFEWAY INC.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer