Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, INC. v. EAST CHARLESTON, INC., CV 11-02587 LHK. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130510664 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS PORTER COLOGNE ACT THIRD PARTY CLAIMS, COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Pursuant to the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Dismiss Porter Cologne Act Third Party Claims, Counterclaims, and Cross-Claims, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the following claims shall be dismissed with prejudice: • East Charleston, Inc., and Pacific American Management Company's Counterclaims Against Plaintiff Schlumberger Technology Corpora
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS PORTER COLOGNE ACT THIRD PARTY CLAIMS, COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Dismiss Porter Cologne Act Third Party Claims, Counterclaims, and Cross-Claims, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the following claims shall be dismissed with prejudice:

• East Charleston, Inc., and Pacific American Management Company's Counterclaims Against Plaintiff Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Inc., Docket No. 11 (Eighth Claim for Relief); • East Charleston, Inc. and Pacific American Management Company's First Amended Third Party Complaint, Docket No. 70 (Eighth Claim for Relief); • Advalloy, Inc.'s Second Amended Cross Claims Against Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Inc. and National Semiconductor (Maine), Docket No. 99 (Fifth Cross-Claim for Relief).

Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to dismissal of these claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer