Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REYES v. CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INC., CV 12-05811 EJD. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130516891 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-2] EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. On January 31, 2013, Defendant RED HILL LAW GROUP, P.C., filed its Special Motion to Strike Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim, pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure 425.16 (Doc. 33). 2. Plaintiff filed an Opposition on February 22, 2013 (Doc. 42). 3. Defendant, RED HILL LAW GROUP P.C.'s motion is curr
More

STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-2]

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. On January 31, 2013, Defendant RED HILL LAW GROUP, P.C., filed its Special Motion to Strike Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim, pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 (Doc. 33).

2. Plaintiff filed an Opposition on February 22, 2013 (Doc. 42).

3. Defendant, RED HILL LAW GROUP P.C.'s motion is currently set for hearing on March 22, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Edward J. Davila.

4. The parties request that the Court enter an order modifying the briefing schedule for Defendant, RED HILL LAW GROUP, P.C.'s motion as follows:

a. Defendant RED HILL LAW GROUP, P.C.'s reply brief shall be filed on or before March 8, 2013.

5. The modified briefing schedule will have no effect on the March 22, 2013 hearing.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer