Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NEOCONIX, INC. v. R&D CIRCUITS, INC., 12-cv-06153 MEJ. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130521824 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 20, 2013
Latest Update: May 20, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUING THE STAY OF ALL CASE DEADLINES [CIVIL L.R. 7-11 AND 7-12] MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff Neoconix, Inc., and Defendants R&D Circuits, Inc., and R&D Sockets, Inc., (collectively, "the Parties") desire a sufficient period of time to exchange relevant documents, submit mediation briefs, and conduct a mediation, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to a 90-day extension of all case management and related deadlines. TH
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUING THE STAY OF ALL CASE DEADLINES [CIVIL L.R. 7-11 AND 7-12]

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Neoconix, Inc., and Defendants R&D Circuits, Inc., and R&D Sockets, Inc., (collectively, "the Parties") desire a sufficient period of time to exchange relevant documents, submit mediation briefs, and conduct a mediation, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to a 90-day extension of all case management and related deadlines.

THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, the Parties agree and stipulate to the below extended deadlines; upon expiration of the 90-day stay, the Parties shall file a joint status report for the Court's review.

Item or Matter Current Deadline Extended Deadline Plaintiffs' Response to May 30, 2013 September 12, 2013 Defendants' Answer and Counterclaims File consent/declination to June 7, 2013 September 20, 2013 proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Meet and confer regarding June 14, 2013 September 27, 2013 initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan File ADR certification, June 14, 2013, unless the September 27, 2013, unless Stipulation to the ADR Parties jointly request the Parties jointly request Process, and/or Notice for assignment to particular ADR assignment to particular ADR Phone Conference process prior to May 15, 2013 ADR process prior to end of stay File reports and complete June 28, 2013 October 11, 2013 initial disclosures or state objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) File Initial Case Management June 28, 2013 October 24, 2013 Statement Initial Case Management Not currently set Oct. 31, 2013 at Conference 10:00 a.m. [a date and time on or after October 25, 2013, that the Court deems appropriate]

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED: The stay is continued for an additional 90 days. The parties shall file a joint status report for the Court's review at the end of the 90 day stay. The extended deadlines are granted as amended by the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer