Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CIRCLE CLICK MEDIA LLC v. REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, 3:12-CV-04000 SC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130523990 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2013
Latest Update: May 15, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12, and 16-12, Plaintiffs Circle Click Media LLC, Metro Talent, LLC, and CTNY Insurance Group LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Regus Management Group, LLC, Regus Business Centre, LLC, Regus plc, and HQ Global Workplaces LLC (collectively, "Defendants")
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12, and 16-12, Plaintiffs Circle Click Media LLC, Metro Talent, LLC, and CTNY Insurance Group LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Regus Management Group, LLC, Regus Business Centre, LLC, Regus plc, and HQ Global Workplaces LLC (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and request that the time for Plaintiffs to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaims (Doc. 78) of Regus Management Group, LLC ("RMG") be enlarged until, and including, June 24, 2013. The parties also stipulate and request that the following briefing schedule be established for any motions to dismiss ("Motions to Dismiss") that Plaintiffs intend to file by June 24, 2013: i) Defendant RMG's oppositions thereto be due by, and including, July 15, 2013; and ii) Plaintiffs' replies to Defendant's oppositions be due by, and including, July 26, 2013. The parties further stipulate and request that the Plaintiffs may notice their Motions to Dismiss for August 9, 2013, at 10:00 A.M., and that the Case Management Conference, currently set for June 21, 2013, be continued to September 13, 2013, at 10:00 A.M.

Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 65) on February 11, 2013, alleging a putative class action. After Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 69), which the Court granted in part and denied in part pursuant to its Order dated April 22, 2013 (Doc. 77), Defendants timely filed their Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (Doc. 78) on May 6, 2013. Absent an extension, an answer or other response would be due on May 28, 2013. (See Declaration of Joseph A. Garofolo ¶ 3 filed concurrently herewith). Plaintiffs currently intend to file motions to dismiss in response to some or all of the Counterclaims. (Id.).

Plaintiffs' lead counsel's wife is expecting the birth of their third child (a second daughter) with a due date on May 20, 2013, and Plaintiffs' lead counsel wishes to reduce some of the burden of his litigation schedule surrounding his wife's due date to spend time with his family and new daughter. (See id. at ¶ 4).

Accordingly, the parties have stipulated to the extended briefing schedule set forth above. The parties also believe that judicial economy may be achieved by continuing the Case Management Conference currently set for June 21, 2013, to September 13, 2013, which would be after the requested hearing on Plaintiffs' Motions to Dismiss, and Plaintiffs' counsel has a scheduling conflict with travel to and attendance at a wedding in which he is involved on the date currently set for the Case Management Conference of June 21, 2013. (See id. at ¶ 5). Plaintiffs request that they be permitted to file an updated joint Case Management Statement by September 6, 2013 (seven days prior to the requested date for the continued Case Management Conference).

Plaintiffs' counsel has confirmed with the Court that August 9, 2013, at 10:00 A.M., is currently available for the Court to hear Plaintiffs' Motions to Dismiss and September 13, 2013, at 10:00 A.M., is available for a Case Management Conference. (See id. at ¶ 6).

This is the first request for an enlargement of the time for Plaintiffs to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaims and the briefing schedule relating to the Motions to Dismiss, and the second request for a continuance of the Case Management Conference. (Id. at ¶ 7).

The parties do not believe that the requested continuance will have any effect on the overall schedule for this case. (Id. at ¶ 8).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court orders the following i) Plaintiffs may respond to Defendant's Counterclaims by June 24, 2013, by filing an answer of motions to dismiss noticed for August 9, 2013, at 10:00 A.M.; ii) Defendant's oppositions thereto are due by July 15, 2013; and iii) Plaintiffs' replies to Defendant's oppositions are due by July 26, 2013.

The Court further orders that the Case Management Conference currently set for June 21, 2013, is continued to September 13, 2013, at 10:00 A.M. The parties shall file an updated joint Case Management Statement no later than September 6, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer