MARKER v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, C09-05956 RMW. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130523a07
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 22, 2013
Latest Update: May 22, 2013
Summary: PARTIES' STIPULATION RE: EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED ORDER] RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff") and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collective y the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: (1) Plaintiff accepts Defendants' designation of Dr. Paul C. Cassini as a Rule 26(a)(2) expert in this case based upon the disclosures made to date and no further Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure need be made; (2) Plainti
Summary: PARTIES' STIPULATION RE: EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED ORDER] RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff") and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collective y the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: (1) Plaintiff accepts Defendants' designation of Dr. Paul C. Cassini as a Rule 26(a)(2) expert in this case based upon the disclosures made to date and no further Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure need be made; (2) Plaintif..
More
PARTIES' STIPULATION RE: EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED ORDER]
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff") and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collective y the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
(1) Plaintiff accepts Defendants' designation of Dr. Paul C. Cassini as a Rule 26(a)(2) expert in this case based upon the disclosures made to date and no further Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure need be made;
(2) Plaintiff will take Dr. Cassini's deposition at his Palo Alto office on May 22, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.;
(3) On or before May 22, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., Defendants and/or Dr. Cassini will provide Plaintiff with: (a) all documents in Dr. Cassini's possession concerning the Plaintiff; and (b) all communications, including billings, if any, between Dr. Cassini and Defendants' counsel;
(4) Plaintiff will have seven business days from the date of the deposition of Dr. Cassini to designate a Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) rebuttal expert to Dr. Cassini who will then be subject to deposition no later than June 12, 2013. If plaintiff designates Dr. Scott M Taylor as a rebuttal expert, no further disclosure need be made except for a brief statement of the general substance of the rebuttal testimony Dr. Taylor is expected to give.
(5) Defendants accept Plaintiff's designation of Dr. Scott M. Taylor as a Rule 26(a)(2) expert in this case based upon the disclosures made to date and no further Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure need be made;
(6) Defendants will take Dr. Taylor's deposition at his Oakland office on May 31, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.;
(7) On or before May 31, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., Plaintiff and/or Dr. Taylor will provide Defendants with: (a) all documents in Dr. Taylor's possession concerning the Plaintiff; and (b) all communications, including billings, if any, between Dr. Taylor and Plaintiff's counsel;
(8) Defendants will have seven business days from the date of the deposition of Dr. Taylor to designate a Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) rebuttal expert to Dr. Taylor who will then be subject to deposition no later than June 12, 2013;
(9) The Parties shall cover their own deposition costs;
(10) The May 24, 2013 hearing on Defendants' Motion to Extend Time for Expert Disclosure and Expert Discovery as to the Independent Medical Examiner Only ("Motion") is taken off calendar.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Parties' stipulation above and hereby approves. The May 24, 2013 hearing on Defendants' Motion is taken off calendar.
Source: Leagle
