Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

OSORIO v. SILVERA, CV11-03890. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130530b08 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 28, 2013
Latest Update: May 28, 2013
Summary: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, AND STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. The parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of record, James Dal Bon, Esq., DUNK DAL BON & MARGAIN, for Plaintiffs GILDARDO OSORIO, RUPERTO INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALEZ, MARIN CORTEZ, ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO RIOS, GERARDO DAMIAN, ALFONSO GARCIA RICO, GUADALUPE PONCE, JORGE GARCIA, FELIX JIMENEZ, JUAN HERNANDEZ, EFRAIN RODRIGUEZ, CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, JOSE MEDEI
More

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, AND STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

The parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of record, James Dal Bon, Esq., DUNK DAL BON & MARGAIN, for Plaintiffs GILDARDO OSORIO, RUPERTO INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALEZ, MARIN CORTEZ, ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO RIOS, GERARDO DAMIAN, ALFONSO GARCIA RICO, GUADALUPE PONCE, JORGE GARCIA, FELIX JIMENEZ, JUAN HERNANDEZ, EFRAIN RODRIGUEZ, CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, JOSE MEDEIROS, (hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Daniel G. Hems, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS, for Defendants MARIA SILVEIRA, GABRIEL SILVEIRA, S & S DRYWALL, INC., S & S DRYWALL LIMITED, ESPRESSO CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP SERVICE, (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") and, with the authority of their respective clients, stipulate as follows:

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

1. On November 14, 2012 the parties attended a Settlement Conference wherein the parties agreed that the above captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses be dismissed without prejudice pending full payment of the agreed upon settlement.

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

WHEREAS, the parties have fully executed and received the fall settlement amount as set forth in the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims:

WHEREAS, no class was ever certified in this matter; therefore Rule 23 does not apply;

WHEREAS, all that remains to be done in this case is the entry of an Order dismissing with prejudice the entire action;

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

1. The Court should enter an Order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to all parties.

ORDER

1. The Court hereby issues an order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer