BENEDICT v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, C 13-0119 LHK. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130603758
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY ON PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Pursuant to the Court's May 30, 2013 order, the parties stipulate to stay discovery on Defendant's counterclaims and Plaintiff's two new named plaintiffs and two new state law causes of action until the resolution of any such Rule 11 or Rule 12 motions. IT IS SO STIPULATED. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT I
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY ON PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Pursuant to the Court's May 30, 2013 order, the parties stipulate to stay discovery on Defendant's counterclaims and Plaintiff's two new named plaintiffs and two new state law causes of action until the resolution of any such Rule 11 or Rule 12 motions. IT IS SO STIPULATED. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY ON PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's May 30, 2013 order, the parties stipulate to stay discovery on Defendant's counterclaims and Plaintiff's two new named plaintiffs and two new state law causes of action until the resolution of any such Rule 11 or Rule 12 motions.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
