Filed: Jun. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff ACCO Brands USA LLC and Defendant Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and respectfully request as follows: 1. WHEREAS, the Court entered an Amended Case Management Scheduling Order on April 3, 2012 (Dkt 28) (the "Order"), in which the
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff ACCO Brands USA LLC and Defendant Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and respectfully request as follows: 1. WHEREAS, the Court entered an Amended Case Management Scheduling Order on April 3, 2012 (Dkt 28) (the "Order"), in which the C..
More
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
Plaintiff ACCO Brands USA LLC and Defendant Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and respectfully request as follows:
1. WHEREAS, the Court entered an Amended Case Management Scheduling Order on April 3, 2012 (Dkt 28) (the "Order"), in which the Court set forth the case schedule;
2. WHEREAS, the Order required all dispositive motions to be heard no later than September 26, 2013;
3. WHEREAS, the Order required all pretrial motions (e.g., motions in limine, Daubert motions) to be heard no later than November 21, 2013;
4. WHEREAS, the parties have been discussing and continue to discuss in good faith settlement of this case;
5. WHEREAS, because of their settlement efforts, and the devotion of resources and attention thereto, the parties agreed to postpone certain discovery-related activities;
6. WHEREAS, although the parties continue to engage in settlement efforts, and they continue to work cooperatively with each other regarding discovery, case management and other case scheduling issues, they respectfully believe that, in the event the case does not settle, modest extensions of two deadlines set by the Order are critical to just and efficient case management;
7. ACCORDINGLY, the parties respectfully request that the September 26, 2013 deadline for hearing dispositive motions be continued to October 17, 2013, and that the November 21, 2013 deadline for hearing pretrial motions be continued to December 12, 2013.
8. These schedule modifications will not affect the trial date.
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED THAT:
1. The September 26, 2013 deadline for hearing dispositive motions is continued to October 17, 2013, and,
2. The November 21, 2013 deadline for hearing pretrial motions is continued to December 12, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
