UNITED BEAUTY PRODUCTS, INC. v. K$ PRODUCTIONS, INC., C 12-05670 HRL. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130618895
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL JUDGMENT ENTRY HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff United Beauty Products, Inc. and Defendant K$ Productions, Inc. have informed the Court the parties have settled this matter. Upon representation of counsel that the above-captioned case has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED the docket be marked for all: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant as "settled and dismissed with prejudice," with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs; FU
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL JUDGMENT ENTRY HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff United Beauty Products, Inc. and Defendant K$ Productions, Inc. have informed the Court the parties have settled this matter. Upon representation of counsel that the above-captioned case has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED the docket be marked for all: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant as "settled and dismissed with prejudice," with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs; FUR..
More
STIPULATED DISMISSAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff United Beauty Products, Inc. and Defendant K$ Productions, Inc. have informed the Court the parties have settled this matter.
Upon representation of counsel that the above-captioned case has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED the docket be marked for all:
1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant as "settled and dismissed with prejudice," with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs;
FURTHER, the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to resolve disputes concerning the memorialization of this settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
