Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

COX v. ALLIN CORPORATION PLAN, C12-5880 SBA. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130620a59 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2013
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Whereas, Pursuant to the Clerk's Notice of June 12, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby (collectively, the "Parties") are calendared to appear for a Case Management Conference on June 19, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.; Whereas, Laurence F. Padway (counsel for Plaintiff) is scheduled for surgery on June 19, 2013 and unavailable to attend the
More

AMENDED STIPULATING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Whereas, Pursuant to the Clerk's Notice of June 12, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby (collectively, the "Parties") are calendared to appear for a Case Management Conference on June 19, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.;

Whereas, Laurence F. Padway (counsel for Plaintiff) is scheduled for surgery on June 19, 2013 and unavailable to attend the case management conference;

Now, therefore, the parties stipulate to continue the case management conference to July 10, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The case management conference in the above matter is continued to July 10, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement which complies with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff shall assume responsibility for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date. Plaintiff's counsel is to set up the conference call with all the parties on the line and call chambers at (510) 637-3559. NO PARTY SHALL CONTACT CHAMBERS DIRECTLY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF THE COURT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer