Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CSR TECHNOLOGY INC. v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 3:12-cv-02619-JST (JSC). (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130625832 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR Technology Inc. ("CSR") and Defendant and Counterclaimant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. ("Freescale") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, the Court issued Case Management Order No
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR Technology Inc. ("CSR") and Defendant and Counterclaimant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. ("Freescale") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, the Court issued Case Management Order No. 2, setting certain deadlines (Dkt. No. 61).

WHEREAS, the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement is currently due on June 24, 2013.

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred regarding the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement on June 11th, June 18th and June 20th 2013.

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a continuation of the filing date for the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement by one day, to June 25, 2013, would allow the parties additional time to meet and confer regarding the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement.

WHEREAS, the short continuation of the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement would not conflict with, or require any additional changes to, the current case schedule as the Claim Construction briefing, hearing and tutorial dates would remain unchanged.

WHEREAS, the requested time modification will have no effect on any other date in the schedule for the case.

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously stipulated to change any date relating to Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement and the only prior extensions of time granted in this case are the Court's June 26, 2012, order granting Freescale a thirty-day extension of time to respond to CSR's Complaint (Dkt. No. 12) and the Magistrate Judge Corley's January 7, 2013, order modifying the briefing schedule and hearing date for Freescale's Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 48).

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement shall be continued as follows:

Event Current Due Date New Due Date Joint Claim Construction June 24, 2013 June 25, 2013 and Pre-Hearing Statement

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer