Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE HP ERISA LITIGATION, C-12-6199 CRB. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130627a77 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. WHEREAS, on May, 9, 2013, the Court entered the Order Revising Briefing Schedule (the "Order") (Docket 49); WHEREAS, the Order provided that any amended complaint shall be filed no later than June 3, 2013 and set a briefing schedule whereby: 1. defendants' responsive pleadings are due by July 18, 2013; 2. plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed, are due to be file
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on May, 9, 2013, the Court entered the Order Revising Briefing Schedule (the "Order") (Docket 49);

WHEREAS, the Order provided that any amended complaint shall be filed no later than June 3, 2013 and set a briefing schedule whereby:

1. defendants' responsive pleadings are due by July 18, 2013; 2. plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed, are due to be filed by September 3, 2013; and 3. defendants' reply briefs in support of any motions to dismiss are due to be filed by October 3, 2013;

WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (the "Amended Complaint") (Docket 50);

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint added eight new defendants: David W. Healy, Michael J. Holston, Catherine A. Lesjak, Mark A. Levine, John N. McMullen, James T. Murrin, John F. Schultz and Shoreline Investment Management Company;

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties wish to revise the briefing schedule for the anticipated motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, and respectfully requested that the Court order as follows:

1. Defendants shall have until August 16, 2013 to file their responsive pleadings. 2. Plaintiffs shall have until October 15, 2013 to file their opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed; and 3. Defendants shall file and serve their replies in support of the motions to dismiss on or before November 15, 2013. 4. This stipulation is without prejudice to any party seeking additional relief via stipulation or court order.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer