Filed: Jul. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 24, 2013, EA submitted a motion for judgment as a matter of law that Antonick's claims are barred by the statute of limitations ("JMOL motion"); WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court heard argument on EA's JMOL motion
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 24, 2013, EA submitted a motion for judgment as a matter of law that Antonick's claims are barred by the statute of limitations ("JMOL motion"); WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court heard argument on EA's JMOL motion;..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2013, EA submitted a motion for judgment as a matter of law that Antonick's claims are barred by the statute of limitations ("JMOL motion");
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court heard argument on EA's JMOL motion;
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court ordered Antonick to file an opposition to EA's JMOL motion and ordered EA to file a reply in support of its JMOL motion;
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court requested that the parties set a briefing schedule for Antonick's opposition and EA's reply;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their respective counsel of record, that Antonick will file an opposition to EA's JMOL motion on July 5, 2013, and that EA will file a reply in support of its JMOL motion on July 11, 2013.
Defendant's undersigned counsel, Susan J. Harriman, hereby attests that Leonard W. Aragon, counsel for Plaintiff, concurs in the filing of this Stipulation, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1.
DATED: June 28, 2013 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By: /s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: (602) 840-5900
Facsimile: (602) 840-3012
rob@hbsslaw.com
leonard@hbsslaw.com
Stuart M. Paynter (226147)
Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice)
THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 626-4486
Facsimile: (866) 734-0622
Email: stuart@smplegal.com
jmurray@smplegal.com
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
