SGT INVESTMENTS, LLC v. SANDY PROCTOR, C 13-00658 WHA. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130730c33
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. The undersigned judge has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins and agrees that this unlawful detainer action should be remanded for the reasons stated in the report (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff has failed to respond to the magistrate judge's order to show cause why this action should not be remanded for failure to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. The undersigned judge has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins and agrees that this unlawful detainer action should be remanded for the reasons stated in the report (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff has failed to respond to the magistrate judge's order to show cause why this action should not be remanded for failure to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has a..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The undersigned judge has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins and agrees that this unlawful detainer action should be remanded for the reasons stated in the report (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff has failed to respond to the magistrate judge's order to show cause why this action should not be remanded for failure to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has also failed to file a timely objection to the magistrate judge's report recommending this case be remanded. This order therefore ADOPTS in full the report and recommendation of Judge Cousins. This action is hereby REMANDED to Alemeda County Superior Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
