SHAW v. CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC., 13-cv-02633 EJD. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130730c69
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (Local Rule 6-1) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Plaintiff CECIL SHAW ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC. (Erroneously sued herein as CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC., aka CON MAC RESTAURANTS, INC. dba MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS aka MCDONALD'S #620) ("Defendant"), through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and agree that Defendant's time to answer or otherwise plead and respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be extended
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (Local Rule 6-1) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Plaintiff CECIL SHAW ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC. (Erroneously sued herein as CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC., aka CON MAC RESTAURANTS, INC. dba MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS aka MCDONALD'S #620) ("Defendant"), through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and agree that Defendant's time to answer or otherwise plead and respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be extended ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (Local Rule 6-1)
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
Plaintiff CECIL SHAW ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC. (Erroneously sued herein as CON-LEE RESTAURANTS, INC., aka CON MAC RESTAURANTS, INC. dba MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS aka MCDONALD'S #620) ("Defendant"), through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and agree that Defendant's time to answer or otherwise plead and respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be extended to August 15, 2013.
Defendant's answer or responsive pleading is presently due on August 1, 2013, and the parties have agreed upon an extension to August 15, 2013. No hearings, conferences, or other deadlines have yet been set by the Court.
Good cause exists to extend Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. The parties are in agreement that this extension is appropriate in order to afford Defendant the opportunity to investigate the allegations of the complaint and potentially permit the parties to commence early settlement negotiations. This stipulation represents the parties' first agreement to extend Defendant's response deadline.
Plaintiff's counsel has authorized the filing of this stipulation with her electronic signature.
Source: Leagle
