Filed: Jul. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Court set the following schedule for EA's previously-filed Rule 50(a) motion: Antonick's opposition by August 2, 2013, EA's reply by August 12, 2013, and motion hearing on August 23, 2013; WHEREAS, Rule 50(b) provides that the mechanism for obtaining JMOL postverdict is
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Court set the following schedule for EA's previously-filed Rule 50(a) motion: Antonick's opposition by August 2, 2013, EA's reply by August 12, 2013, and motion hearing on August 23, 2013; WHEREAS, Rule 50(b) provides that the mechanism for obtaining JMOL postverdict is ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Court set the following schedule for EA's previously-filed Rule 50(a) motion: Antonick's opposition by August 2, 2013, EA's reply by August 12, 2013, and motion hearing on August 23, 2013;
WHEREAS, Rule 50(b) provides that the mechanism for obtaining JMOL postverdict is a Rule 50(b) motion that renews the preverdict Rule 50(a) motion, the parties have agreed that EA will file a single Rule 50(b) motion ("EA's Rule 50(b) Motion");
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed upon a revised briefing and hearing schedule for EA's Rule 50(b) Motion;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their respective counsel of record, on the following schedule for EA's Rule 50(b) Motion:
• EA's Motion: August 15, 2013;
• Antonick's Opposition: August 29, 2013;
• EA's Reply: September 6, 2013; and
• Hearing: September 13, 2013 (or as soon thereafter as the Court's schedule permits).
This stipulation does not alter the previously ordered briefing and hearing dates regarding Antonick's motion for prejudgment interest.
EA's undersigned counsel, Susan J. Harriman, hereby attests that Robert B. Carey, counsel for Antonick, concurs in the filing of this Stipulation, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
