Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. v. COOLIT SYSTEMS INC., 3:12-CV-04498-EMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130816837 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT COOLIT SYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 93]; [PR OPOS ED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. On August 2, 2013, Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. ("CoolIT") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Prevent Asetek's Double Recovery of Damages and, in the Alternative, for Patent Exhaustion. Dkt. 93. CoolIT noticed the hearing for the motion for September 19, 2013. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings,
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT COOLIT SYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 93]; [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

On August 2, 2013, Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. ("CoolIT") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Prevent Asetek's Double Recovery of Damages and, in the Alternative, for Patent Exhaustion. Dkt. 93. CoolIT noticed the hearing for the motion for September 19, 2013. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S's (collectively, "Asetek") opposition is currently due on August 16, 2013.

Asetek intends to submit a declaration in support of its opposition, but the declarant is currently traveling abroad this week. On August 12, 2013, Asetek's counsel requested a one-week extension to respond to CoolIT's motion. Counsel for CoolIT agreed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2(a) and 7-12, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to a request for an order extending the time for Asetek to respond to CoolIT's motion by one week, from August 16, 2013, up to and including August 23, 2013. No changes to the noticed hearing date are necessary in light of this requested extension.

By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the filing of this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer