Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 1827. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130827b38 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF TATUNG COMPANY AND TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. ("T-Mobile") and Defendants Tatung Company, ("Tatung") and Tatung Company of America, Inc., ("Tatung America"), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims being asserted against Tatung and Tatung America in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 41(a)
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF TATUNG COMPANY AND TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. ("T-Mobile") and Defendants Tatung Company, ("Tatung") and Tatung Company of America, Inc., ("Tatung America"), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims being asserted against Tatung and Tatung America in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:

1. T-Mobile and Tatung and Tatung America seek the dismissal without prejudice of all claims asserted against Tatung and Tatung America in this action.

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed Order of Dismissal.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:

1. All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Defendants Tatung and Tatung America in the underlying action are hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2); and, 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer