Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANDISK CORPORATION v. ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC, 3:11-cv-05243-RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130827b43 Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO SANDISK'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Defendant Round Rock Research LLC ("Round Rock") and Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk") hereby stipulate that the Court grant Round Rock permission to file a Corrected Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk's Second Amended Complaint. Round Rock's original Amended Answer and Counterclaims to
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO SANDISK'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Defendant Round Rock Research LLC ("Round Rock") and Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk") hereby stipulate that the Court grant Round Rock permission to file a Corrected Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk's Second Amended Complaint. Round Rock's original Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 214) contains an administrative error that should be corrected in the official record. The parties further stipulate that SanDisk be granted fourteen days from the filing of Round Rock's Corrected Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk's Second Amended Complaint to file its responsive pleading.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer