STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

[DECLARATION OF JEFFREY S. ROBERTS FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH]

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") and Defendant Thomson S.A. enter into this Stipulation concerning the matter entitled Sharp Electronics Corp. et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al., No. 13-cv-01173, which was related to In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-cv-05944, by an Order of Judge Samuel Conti on March 26, 2013.

SUBJECT TO THE COURT'S APPROVAL, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2013, Sharp filed a complaint in the Northern District of California alleging antitrust violations by manufacturers, distributors and sellers of CRT and CRT Products, captioned Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173 (the "Sharp Complaint");

WHEREAS, on May 24, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation extending Thomson S.A.'s time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Sharp Complaint to July 3, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1690];

WHEREAS, Thomson S.A. filed a Motion to Dismiss the Sharp Complaint on July 3, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1765] ("Motion to Dismiss");

WHEREAS, on July 12, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation extending the deadline for Sharp to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until July 31, 2013, and to extend the deadline for Thomson S.A. to file a reply to Sharp's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until August 14, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1771];

WHEREAS, on July 15, 2013, an order was entered granting the stipulation of Sharp and Thomson S.A. extending the deadline for Sharp's opposition brief and Thomson S.A.'s reply brief [Dkt. No. 1775];

WHEREAS, on July 24, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation further extending the deadline for Sharp to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until August 7, 2013, and extending the deadline for Thomson S.A. to file a reply to Sharp's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until August 21, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1795];

WHEREAS, on July 29, 2013, an order was entered granting the stipulation of Sharp and Thomson S.A. extending the deadline for Sharp's opposition brief and Thomson S.A.'s reply brief [Dkt. No. 1806].

NOW, THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b), SHARP AND THOMSON CONSUMER, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.