Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. TORRE, CR-13-00533 WHO. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130909532 Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 5, 2013, AND SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. The defendant, RICHARD TORRE, represented by RITA BOSWORTH, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the government, represented by DANIEL P. TALBERT, Special Assistant United States Attorney, stipulate that time should be excluded from September 5, 2013 to September 19, 2013 from the Speedy Trial Clock. The parties appeared before the Court on September 5, 2013. The partie
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 5, 2013, AND SEPTEMBER 19, 2013

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

The defendant, RICHARD TORRE, represented by RITA BOSWORTH, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the government, represented by DANIEL P. TALBERT, Special Assistant United States Attorney, stipulate that time should be excluded from September 5, 2013 to September 19, 2013 from the Speedy Trial Clock.

The parties appeared before the Court on September 5, 2013. The parties jointly requested to appear before the Court on September 19, 2013 for a status/change of plea hearing. Based on the parties' request, the matter was continued to September 19, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Orrick.

The parties now jointly request that time be excluded from the Speedy Trial Clock from September 5, 2013, to September 19, 2013. The parties request that time be excluded based upon the need for effective preparation of counsels, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties are attempting to negotiate a possible resolution of this matter. Respectfully submitted,

ORDER

Based upon the representations of counsels and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between September 5, 2013 and September 19, 2013 would unreasonably deny counsels the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between September 5, 2013 and September 19, 2013 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between September 5, 2013 and September 19, 2013 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer