Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, 3:12-cv-06467-MMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130911719 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CLOSE OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. ("Mentor Graphics") as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the March 22, 2013 Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. 32), the date for the Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim Construction Discovery is currently September 4, 2013; WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled deposi
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CLOSE OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. ("Mentor Graphics") as follows:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the March 22, 2013 Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. 32), the date for the Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim Construction Discovery is currently September 4, 2013;

WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled depositions relating to claim construction issues on September 10 and 11;

WHEREAS, the only other prior scheduling modification in this case has been a stipulation to extend the date for the parties to exchange Patent Local Rule 4-2 disclosures (Dkt. 48), which did not affect any other scheduled dates or events;

WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any other scheduled dates or events in this action.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate to the following modification to the Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim Construction Discovery:

Event Current Date New Date Close of Claim Construction Discovery September 4, 2013 September 13, 2013 (Patent L.R. 4-4)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, this stipulation is accompanied by the Declaration of Andrew M. Mason, submitted herewith.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer