IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 2143. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130924834
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge. On August 23, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Statement filed August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 959). Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2-8 of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories by October 1, 2013 and at the close
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge. On August 23, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Statement filed August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 959). Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2-8 of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories by October 1, 2013 and at the close ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.
On August 23, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Statement filed August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 959). Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2-8 of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories by October 1, 2013 and at the close of fact discovery consistent with this Court's guidance at the August 23, 2013 hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
