Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 2143. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130924834 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge. On August 23, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Statement filed August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 959). Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2-8 of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories by October 1, 2013 and at the close
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.

On August 23, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Statement filed August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 959). Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2-8 of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories by October 1, 2013 and at the close of fact discovery consistent with this Court's guidance at the August 23, 2013 hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer