COUTO v. SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS SALARY CONTINUANCE PLAN, CV12-00633-RMW. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130930e26
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff LAURIE COUTO and Defendants SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS SALARY CONTINUANCE PLAN and SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC (erroneously sued as "SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS, INC.") (hereinafter collectively the "Parties") that the above-captioned action, including all claims, be hereby dismissed with pre
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff LAURIE COUTO and Defendants SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS SALARY CONTINUANCE PLAN and SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC (erroneously sued as "SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS, INC.") (hereinafter collectively the "Parties") that the above-captioned action, including all claims, be hereby dismissed with prej..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff LAURIE COUTO and Defendants SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS SALARY CONTINUANCE PLAN and SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US LLC (erroneously sued as "SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS, INC.") (hereinafter collectively the "Parties") that the above-captioned action, including all claims, be hereby dismissed with prejudice, as to all Defendants.
Each party will bear her/its own costs and attorneys' fees.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
