LONG v. FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC, 3:13-CV-02919-EMC. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131010a59
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff Daniel Long and Defendants Forty Niners Football Company LLC and John York, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for responsive pleadings to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as follows: 1. Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be extended
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff Daniel Long and Defendants Forty Niners Football Company LLC and John York, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for responsive pleadings to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as follows: 1. Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be extended ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Daniel Long and Defendants Forty Niners Football Company LLC and John York, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for responsive pleadings to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as follows:
1. Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to October 16, 2013.
2. Defendants' deadline to file a reply to Plaintiff's Opposition shall be extended to October 23, 2013.
The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, set for November 7, 2013, shall not be affected by the stipulated extensions.
ORDER
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested herein, the Court hereby makes the foregoing Stipulation the Order of this Court. Plaintiff's reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss must be filed on or before October 16, 2013. Defendants' reply shall be filed on or before October 23, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Source: Leagle
